Lonely Musings
Is there any doubt that Michael Jackson died around 1990, 91ish and there's been this mutated, extra-terrestrial-looking imposter running around in his place for the past 15 years? I just don't buy the idea that it's the same guy, chums. I can't. How can you watch "Thriller" or "Billie Jean" or "The Way You Make Me Feel" and come to the conclusion that it's the same guy on CNN everyday today? IT ISN'T! IT CAN'T BE! I WON'T BE SWAYED!! You don't crash and burn that bad. You don't change colors. You don't lose talent just that easy. And you don't go from having this unmistakable aura about you at all times - this magic sort of essence that just, like, makes you the center of gravity with the entire of pop-humanity drawn inexaustably to your presence obsessively - to a fragile, mutated little creep that repulses, reviles, and induces vomitting and who is on trial for tickling eight-year-old taint a few too many times. Hence, the inescapable conclusion - TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE!!
Thankyou again to the Venerable Schwegler for another detailed, articulated, and well-researched comment. Thankyou, also, to "Anonymous Bob" for his thoughts. Seems like Vick is the subject of this blog's "Sports Heavyweight Bout" and I'm happy to engage. It's a subject I have much interest in.
Round 1: (DING!) "Sherry comes out a little slow, seemingly interested in only responding to certain statistical data at this early juncture."
Say what you will, Vick did NOT have over 3,000 yards this season. His statistics - the ones that go with the position he plays - were 15gms, 2,313yds, 14TD's, 12INTs.
Round 2: (DING!) "Folks, we talked with some of the staff of Dominion of Cool during the break, and they informed us that in this round, Sherry will try to focus on the argument comparing Vick's career thus far to Bledsoe's early career."
Frankly, I just do not see the wisdom in comparing Vick's first few years to Bledsoe's, but then it wasn't me who brought it up. So - playing fair - I will now do a little number analysis here. Okay, let's see here - it was argued that this is "technically" only Vick's third season, and so if he only had 14 TD's and 12 INT's, we can compare that to Bledsoe who had 13TD's and 16INT's in his 3rd year. This was followed up by the statement that Bledsoe improved, so can Vick. Alright, let me rap at you for a bit.
First of all, this is not Vick's third season, it is his fourth. If he gets injured playing his "revolutionary" style, that is not an excuse to say "it doesn't count." So with that in mind, Bledsoe's fourth season saw him pass for 4,086 yds, 27 TD's and 15 INTs, which seems to surpass today's "Greatest Quarterback in the game" by some 1,773 yards and 13 TDs. But okay, lets say that "technically" this is only Vick's 3rd year. I'll bite. Wowee, so he threw for one more TD than Bledsoe did in his 3rd season. Keep in mind that Bledsoe also threw for 1,194 more yards than Vick did. And as for the "Bledsoe improved so can Vick" argument - well, it didn't exactly take Bledsoe til his 4rth season to come around as a top NFL QB. In fact, unless I'm completely insane (which I might be, but that has nothing to do with football), I seem to recall Bledsoe throwing for 4,555 yards and 25 TDs in his SECOND NFL season.
And, just for fun, some more number crunching:
Bledsoe's first 4 seasons: 17,397 yds, 80 TDs
Vick's first 4 seasons: 6,619 yds, 36 TDs
The difference: 10,778yds, and 44 TDs ..... WOW!!!
Bledsoe's first 3 seasons (the honest way - i.e. subtracting his actual 4rth year stats (4,086yds and 27TDs)): 13,311 yds, 53 TDs
Vick's first 3 seasons (the "sportsmanship way" - i.e. only subtracting the year's stats that would hurt his overall stats THE LEAST): 6,034 yds (minus 585 yds from 2003) and 34 TDs (minus 2 TDs from 2001).
The difference: 7,277 yds, and 19 TDs .... CHRIST!!!
Does that answer the issue?
Round 3: (DING) "Historically, folks, Sherry likes to take things up a notch in the third round, steering away from the more conservative defensive tactics, and trying to be a little more explosive offensively. In this case, he'll probably try to take on Vick directly. And of course when we say "historically" we mean based on the previous 0 "Sports Heavyweight Bouts" that have taken place in this blog. Do let's watch."
It was suggested that I may have a problem with Vick. Well, if you can't tell by now, the answer to that question is FUCKINAY YES!! The problem? Twofold: 1. He's wasting his potential, and 2. He's so pompously overblown and drooled over by an NFL that realizes Brett Favre won't be playing forever and Tom Brady isn't exactly going to fill in as "BIGSHOT QB" the way they had hoped. As for the first problem - yes, Vick is wasting his potential. He has one of the strongest (if not THE strongest) arm in the game. But he never bothered to develop that. Never thought this is a gift QB's everywhere, at every level, pray for, work at, kill themselves trying to achieve. No, Vick just said, "Hey, I can run really fast, so I'll just do that." NEWSFLASH: It's not going to last forever, Mike. They've already figured you out (i.e. assign a linebacker the sole responsibility of chasing down Vick, and he's inaffective (see: Shutout loss to the Bucs)). From now on it will only be a matter of continued application. Not to mention you will lose speed as you age, and wave after wave of crushing defensive tackles will deliver you a bevy of "minor injuries" that will add up and take their toll. CONSEQUENT ADVICE: Figure out how to use your fucking cannon of an arm, and YOU WILL BE ONE OF THE GREATS. A QB who can throw, but who can run when he has to, is the most dangerous of them all (See: Donavon McNabb, Phildelphia Eagles). Don't learn to use it? Well, then ask not for whom the bell tolls, Michael. It fucking tolls for you.
The second problem - being pompously overblown. Come on, chums. Let's be real. He is NOT revolutionizing shit. He's capitalizing on oppurtunity, but as I've already said, that oppurtunity will not be long for this game. As for counting running stats and saying - "see, he ran for almost 1000 yds, that makes him a great QB!" That's like saying Brian Moorman is a great punter because he has a good throwing arm in fake-punt situations, or Eric Moulds is a good receiver because he picks up a lot of yards on reverses. A quarterback is the player on the team who specializes in passing. If you cannot pass, then you are not a great quarterback, simply and bottom line. Revolution? For truly revolutionzing a position, watch old tapes of Dominik Hasek. He revolutionized the position with the "butterfly" style, something that had never been done before to the level he executed it. But guess what - they don't say he "revolutionized" the position because the butterfly style was different ... it was because it was something different that happened to be particularly effective in doing what a goaltender's job was (i.e. KEEPING THE PUCK OUT OF THE NET). What we have with Vick is akin to a goaltender that plays some radically new style, but only racks up a GAA of like 2.75 and a Save% of maybe .885. "But his style is different, its never been done before to this extent!!" Yes, but for the love of christ, he can't play his fucking position! He's not a great goaltender. In Vick's case, his paltry, piddling, laughable efforts at throwing the ball make him a disgrace to his position.
And let me re-clarify. It DOES NOT have to be that way. Vick has one of the strongest arms in this league. He just chooses not to develop it, and time is running out for that. But if he continues along this path, he'll place his name solidly with the many players that retire to a lot of head-shaking and throat-clearing while people mutter to themselves "He could have been one of the greats if not for ..." Vick is football's version of Eric Lindros (at least, he's shaping up that way). Lindros came in playing power forward at a level nobody had ever seen. Everyone's concept of a power-forward had previously been "that guy who compliments the speedy winger and puts in maybe thirty goals." But now, for the first time ever, it was the heavy-hitting, scrappy, drop-the-gloves bulldozer that was scoring all the goals, raking up all the assists, and proving to be without doubt the single most valuable player in the league (short of Hasek). No player broke games the way Lindros did. No player improved a team simply by his presence on the ice the way Lindros did. And what happened - washed up by his 27th birthday. It all crashed and burned in a couple of short seasons. And why? Because his body could not sustain the style he played. It wore him down. Shook him up. Beat on him, ragged on him, harped on him until he was left as merely a shell of his former self. A second-rate center at best with what should have been his best years ahead of him, and everyone shaking their heads over their tall, cool Labatt bottles going "Kid could have been one of the greats if not for ..."
Round 4: (DING!) "The staff at the Dominion of Cool told us between rounds that Sherry feels he's put up a good effort here today, and he doesn't really have much left to give in this final round. So basically, look for him just to come out with a few concluding remarks."
A few concluding remarks, chums. Just to recap: Vick has all the potential in the world. Unfortunately, he chooses not to develop it. And let's be honest, the NFL doesn't want him to. He plays so radically different (keeping in mind that DIFFERENT does not necessarily equate to SUPERIOR) that he naturally attracts a lot of attention - hence, merchandising sales are through the roof (his jersey sells second only to Favre's, and guess what! Favre's retiring soon!). They may be well aware that Vick won't be leading SuperBowl charges into his mid-thirties, but they've probably done a good cost-analysis and realized that the money they will make on him over the next few years is worth having his career cut ridiculously, needlessly short. He won't last. When Favre leaves, it won't be Vick who truly steps in for him, though that is what they will tell you. The truth, however, will be that Donavon McNabb will become the game's greatest current QB, and he deserves that. Do I have a problem with running QB's? Hell no. McNabb runs all over the field. The difference is that the guy also happens to be a great passer and he's smart enough to realize that (in the long run) more games will be won on his arm, not his legs. Running when the pocket breaks down, when pressure heats up, when receivers are covered - these are the marks of a resourceful QB (I don't deny Bledsoe is less resourceful than a six-year-old girl would be in the pocket, but then I've never once posited that argument). And nobody has to add up McNabb's running stats to divert attention away from the fact that he is mediocre at best (why? because he's not mediocre, he's fucking good). But the truth is - Vick is NOT. I watched part of an Atlanta game recently. I could only stand 14 plays before I had to turn it off in disgust. Of the 14 plays, 9 were passing plays. Of the 9, Vick put the ball in the air only twice, and both times the laughably pathetic pass landed untouched in the grass. The other 7 times he ran (without looking to actually pass), and one of those times he managed (somehow) to trip over his own fucking feet, fall flat on his face, and FUMBLE. Nobody touched the fucker. Ah, but this is our hero these days. This is our great athlete of the new millenium.
Kind of makes me long for the days of Flutie. At least he TRIED to pass. If his tired, deflating old arm warranted more sympathy than awe, he can at least be forgiven on account of age. But the point is, the ol' mullet tried! Vick can't even give you that. You can have him, as far as I'm concerned. Cause he ain't gonna last.
This is a fun debate, by the way. All are free to jump in, and indeed - please do!! This is great subject matter for a blog that is sadly lacking in that capacity.
- END SPORTS -
CONTROVERSIAL ARGUMENT OF THE WEEK:
Will somebody please organize a war between southern-state trailer-dwelling, trash-hording, tooth-losing, rodeo-cheering REDNECKS and coastal-state book-collecting, CNN-watching, sweater-vest wearing, Michael Moore-dicksucking college HIPPIES. My disgust and loathing for the sub-human former, coupled with my distrust and fear of the arrogant latter leads me to believe that such a violent clash might solve a lot of problems (i.e. many of them would be dead). Honestly, this is an idea worth considering. Ever hear those stories from Civil War times, where families would actually sit out on their porch, or pack a picnic lunch and head out to watch the battles? How great would it be to pack a cooler of beer, grill up some barbequed meats, toss the ol' pigskin around, and watch the "Intellectuals" square off in a mortal combat of sorts against the "white trash?" I think it would be very fucking great, if I am to answer my own question. And then, when its all said and done, we can round up the survivors in dump trucks and deposit them in the ocean, screaming like sissies and begging for mercy. And just like that - no more redneck mutants, and no more hippie poindexters. What say ye?
And now - inspired by the strange and terrible readings of my "Experimental Literature" class - my very own "Life from the perspective of a dildo":
I was at the house of some cougar I'd picked up in a single's bar. We had just finished twenty minutes worth of passionless, aggrevating drunk sex, and she had gone off to take a piss or some shit, I don't know. Anyway, the important thing is that she was out of the room. So I'm sitting there all by myself and I hear this muffled voice coming from a drawer. What the hell is that, I thought to myself. Well, what it was was a dildo. A giant, dull-gray colored mechanism, shaped disturbingly like a penis, but unrealistically huge - mythic proportions, one might say. But that was not the strange thing. The strange thing was that this dildo hopped out of the drawer onto the bed and began talking to me...
"Yes, I am a dildo. Mr. Dildo, in fact. Well, actually, my first name is Marcus-Aurelius, but you can just call me Mr. Dildo."
"Glad to meet you," I said, not really meaning it, but not wishing to be impolite to a talking dildo named Marcus-Aurelius Dildo.
"Listen, fella," it said, looking desperately about. "You gotta get me outta here."
"Oh no," I said. "I'm no thief. Especially no dildo theif."
"But you don't understand!" it cried. "You have no idea what this evil woman puts me through! Why, do you realize that she tries to kill me several times a week!?"
"Kill you?" I asked, suspiciously.
"Yes!" Its voice was frantic now. "She keeps me prisoner in that inpenatrable cell" - I presumed it was talking about the drawer - "and she takes me out every once in a while to try and kill me. She's got me wired with all this electric shit, and when she flips this little switch under my feet I get these horrible shocks sent all throughout my body, sending me into uncontrollable convulsions. Its unbearable!"
"Shit," I said, awed by the cruelty of the woman.
"That's not even the worst of it," it went on. "While I'm being zapped and fried by electric waves, she takes firm hold of me and tries to suffocate me!"
"Suffocate you?"
"Yah! Her species has some orafice that opens and closes where she splits at the waist. She keeps it roasting hot, like an oven, and tries to burn me."
"I thought you said suffocate you."
"That to. Its really cramped in there. So I'm suffocating and burning and convulsing from electric shock, and then this bitch starts trying to drown me!"
"Drown you?"
"Fuckinay!" it screamed. "She fills this cavernous opening with water - only its not water, its some stickly, slimey, foul-smelling ooze. She pushes me in, then pulls me out, just to torture me - let me get a gasp of fresh air, and then back in!"
"My god," I said. Could this really be true? I decided I had an obligation to save Mr. Dildo. And that, your honor, is how I wound up being arrested for dildo theft.
Okay, that's it. My dangerously insane mind has run out of maniacal things to say for today. So leave comments.
A Presto
Mike
